President Donald Trump has continued to roll back green energy developments, and most recently, the administration has offered two electricity companies a billion dollars each in return for scrapping wind farm projects (For additional context, see the PBS News Hour Classroom Daily News Lesson "Why the Trump Administration is paying billions to abandon wind farms").
Donald Trump has claimed that "the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses", while former Danish foreign minister Kristian Jensen explains that "the price of power coming out of a wind turbine is cheaper than that of natural gas". Additionally, Denmark leads as an example, ranking in the world's top 10 economies, and its green energy industry employs 107,000 people and earns about $17 billion a year.
- Which argument do you find more compelling? Why or why not?
- Why do you think Trump continues to cite cost as the main reason for not investing in wind energy, despite evidence to the contrary?
Another argument raised by the administration against wind energy is that it poses a security risk by interfering with radar and allowing hostile aircraft or missiles to penetrate national defenses. However, Martin Couet, a vice president at a major Danish defense company, Terma, argues that the echoes and clutter in signaling caused by wind farms can be mitigated.
- Do you believe that potential interferences and risks to national security outweigh investments in green energy, like wind turbines? Why or why not?
- With the ongoing crises in the Middle East and Ukraine driving fuel shortages and price increases, do you believe the United States should make green energy a higher priority, as Denmark has? Explain with reference to examples and data from the segment.
Media literacy: The News Hour segment included interviews with a former Danish foreign minister, a Danish mayor, and an energy engineer, among others, while interspersed with video clips of interviews with President Donald Trump. Why do you think the story was told through these varying perspectives?